Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '21 at 06:04
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$50
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 168
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 168
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 519 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 6
5% 5.87 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 6.9
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
706GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 113 105 106 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 100
Write 93.2
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 109
61% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V01D4L84GB5285282400 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.7% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 2,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback