MSI X79A-GD65 (8D) (MS-7760)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7760
MotherboardMSI X79A-GD65 (8D) (MS-7760)  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '16 at 20:15
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 0 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 202
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 654
64% 526 Pts
64-Core 758
47% 758 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3360) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 159
Parallax 137
123% 149 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 144
Splatting 115
102% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
36GB free
Firmware: DXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 523
Write 458
Mixed 487
109% 489 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 27.7
153% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 79.6
117% 217 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 107%
Great: 116%
Adata S510 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.3. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.7% Average
Read 203
Write 85.1
Mixed 112
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 15.9
105% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 79.9
DQ Write 99.5
DQ Mixed 30.5
40% 70 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 79%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC51
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 154
Write 137
Mixed 132
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.2
74% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 96%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
236GB free
Firmware: 05.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 94.1
Mixed 104
75% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.3
97% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 76%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
41GB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 90.6
Write 82.1
Mixed 73.7
62% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 0.81
4K Mixed 0.16
49% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$68
23GB free
Firmware: PB4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 79.8
Write 46.2
Mixed 44.2
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.34
83% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 45%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
59GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 97.4
Write 23.5
Mixed 15.7
42% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.79
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.77
78% 2.19 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ32GX3M4X16 1600 CL10 Ser CMZ32GX3M4X16 1600 CL10 Ser CMZ32GX3M4X16 1600 CL10 Ser CMZ32GX3M4X16 1600 CL10 Ser 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 29.6
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 13
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79A-GD65 (8D) (MS-7760) Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI X79A-GD65 (8D) (MS-7760) - $342

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $920
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback