Samsung 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '19 at 20:40
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2467M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 61.8
38% 55.3 Pts
4-Core 85.4
8-Core 98.2
12% 91.8 Pts
64-Core 98.9
6% 98.9 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0C7) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.56
0% 0.74 fps
MRender 1.19
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.02 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.65%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 172 182 190 196 199 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 346
Write 309
Mixed 305
SusWrite 196
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 24.9
90% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 176
141% 199 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 017A 76.B353G.C2V0C 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback