Samsung 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '20 at 20:54
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2467M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 46
2-Core 74.5
45% 66.7 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 110
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0C7) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 1.97
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.25
2% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.56 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 120GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0831C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 78 80 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 438
Write 343
Mixed 282
SusWrite 125
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 15.2
75% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 32.3
65% 134 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 93%
Sandisk i100 16GB
1GB free
Firmware: 11.00.04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 170
Write 58.9
Mixed 53.8
20% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 7.5
29% 8.8 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 9.8
8% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 017A 76.B353G.C2V0C 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.4% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback