Eurocom X7C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics91% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemEurocom X7C  (all builds)
MotherboardEurocom X7C
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '19 at 16:28
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 273
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 855
85% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,092
68% 1,092 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Clevo(1558 7510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91% Outstanding
Lighting 109
Reflection 115
Parallax 110
89% 112 fps
MRender 161
Gravity 102
Splatting 95.3
95% 119 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 771 610 623 624 616 622 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,308
Write 1,607
Mixed 566
SusWrite 644
231% 1,031 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 51
192% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,035
DQ Write 921
DQ Mixed 707
604% 888 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 194%
Great: 254%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
388GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 193 180 125 104 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 490
Write 448
Mixed 340
SusWrite 191
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 9.8
90% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 174
139% 199 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 92%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 124 117 124 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 97
Write 104
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 122
69% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CM4X8GF2400C16S4 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 029E CM4X8GF2400C16S4 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 25.8
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 25.5
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback