Asrock N68-GS4 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 26 '19 at 00:10
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 38
2-Core 51.3
38% 53 Pts
4-Core 42.8
8-Core 56.4
6% 49.6 Pts
64-Core 56
4% 56 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
MSI(1462 8A9E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 930 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
7.01% Terrible
Lighting 8.07
Reflection 7.77
Parallax 8.19
7% 8.01 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 9.87
Splatting 11.4
8% 9.28 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.01%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6 L320S0 320GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BACE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 14 14 22 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 45.2
Write 40
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 15.6
24% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.3
116% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 2.2
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback