MSI NF725M-P31 (MS-7597)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7597
MotherboardMSI NF725M-P31 (MS-7597)  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '17 at 14:52
Run Duration101 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 450-$80
CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 94.3
47% 72.8 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 125
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 340.52
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.11% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.42 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.62 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.11%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6 L320S0 320GB
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BACE Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 61.3
Mixed 68.1
48% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 2.51
4K Mixed 0.24
78% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB 28h SDRAM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NF725M-P31 (MS-7597) Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI NF725M-P31 (MS-7597)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback