MSI FM2-A55M-E33 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI FM2-A55M-E33 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '19 at 18:15
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 132
58% 94 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 176
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 16.5
15% 16.9 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 16.4
16% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 142 138 141 141 140 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.7% Good
Read 236
Write 216
Mixed 203
SusWrite 151
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 35.4
125% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 120
102% 150 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
774GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 176 180 179 182 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 167
Mixed 66
SusWrite 177
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G133381 PSD38G13332 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.8% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2-A55M-E33 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A55M-E33 (MS-7721) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback