Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130909
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 27 '19 at 10:18
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 93
2-Core 187
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 239
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Dell(1028 0577) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 1.67
Reflection 1.62
Parallax 1.31
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 1
Splatting 3.22
2% 2.55 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssdpr-cl 100-120 120GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 385 392 392 319 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 414
Write 364
Mixed 294
SusWrite 331
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 12.5
86% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 34.4
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 17.7
44% 86.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F2G64CB88G4N-DI 830B M2X2G64CB88G7N-DG 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.1% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 18
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 11,760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback