Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '17 at 16:34
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 94.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 197
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 378
50% 378 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
MSI(1462 8A90) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5.42
Parallax 3.5
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 4.63
Splatting 3.22
3% 4.19 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01G04 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 35.8
Write 40
Mixed 36.4
28% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.28
78% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 34%
Hitachi HTS541612J9SA00 120GB-$40
93GB free
Firmware: SBDOC7DP Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 35.2
Mixed 39.5
29% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.71
4K Mixed 0.24
58% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F2G64CB88G4N-DI 830B M2X2G64CB88G7N-DG 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback