Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 8% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5450-$89 1,321 User benchmarks, average bench 31% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Memory 33.5 1-Core 15.8 2-Core 32.2 18% 27.2 Pts	4-Core 31.7 8-Core 32.9 4% 32.3 Pts	64-Core 34 2% 34 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 386 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Asus(1043 1449) 128MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.561.0.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.05% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.1 0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.05% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: 14.01A14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 15 17 15 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.03% Terrible	Read 15.3 Write 21.5 Mixed 23.4 SusWrite 16 14% 19 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.03% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	7.59% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 1.6 6% 2.07 GB/s	Latency 235 17% 235 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.59% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM