Today's hottest deals

Lenovo INVALID

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo INVALID  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 14:39
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T5450-$89
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 19.2
2-Core 38
31% 41.8 Pts
4-Core 38
8-Core 38.4
5% 38.2 Pts
64-Core 37.8
2% 37.8 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Legend(17AA 3C2D) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 0.84
2% 2.12 fps
MRender 2.24
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 3.61
2% 2.19 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS542516K9SA00 160GB-$298
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBCOC31P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 20 12 15 29 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 38
Write 38.1
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 22.2
22% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 30%
Hitachi HTS542516K9SA00 160GB-$298
97GB free
Firmware: BBCOC31P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 36.5
Write 38.2
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 36.1
25% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical INVALID Builds (Compare 2,562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo INVALID

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback