Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20130117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '16 at 16:43
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 67
2-Core 135
58% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 419
41% 334 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7290
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Lighting 44.6
Reflection 42.3
Parallax 41.8
36% 42.9 fps
MRender 39.8
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 34.3
30% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 295
Write 300
Mixed 219
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 13.1
72% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 74.8
DQ Mixed 13.5
21% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 179
Mixed 104
118% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.33
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5471-002.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5471-002.A00LF 12GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.5% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback