Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2715QE 32 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 53.4 2-Core 128 54% 88.2 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 336 35% 279 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 372.54 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	18.2% Very poor	Lighting 21.3 Reflection 24.8 Parallax 19.1 17% 21.7 fps	MRender 28.5 Gravity 22.4 Splatting 23 20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 33 132 30 91 71 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.5% Average	Read 246 Write 170 Mixed 176 SusWrite 81.9 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 21 76% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 107 102% 159 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 100%
OOS2000G 2TB 1,864 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1.5TB free SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 194 195 188 193 195 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 142 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 193 109% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5458-001.A00LF 99P5471-033.A00LF 10GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.7% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 10.2 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	52x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87