Empty empty

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemEmpty empty  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory7.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '19 at 12:31
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2715QE
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 85.5
53% 78.7 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 355
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.59
1% 1.06 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 1.27
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.62 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 187 188 185 185 188 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.4% Average
Read 224
Write 87.9
Mixed 183
SusWrite 186
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 18.7
64% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 113
97% 144 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 100%
OOS2000G 2TB
1.5TB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 209 208 208 209 210 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 176
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 208
124% 169 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 120%
Great: 110%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 4.6 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 11.2
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 9.1
13% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-001.A00LF 99P5471-033.A00LF 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.6% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical empty Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback