Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6174 69 User benchmarks, average bench 39% None, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Memory 35.3 1-Core 32.1 2-Core 63.1 26% 43.5 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 253 22% 190 Pts	64-Core 250 15% 250 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 107GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 222 289 323 305 318 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 85%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 972GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 136 158 173 166 168 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 375 Write 224 Mixed 277 SusWrite 159 58% 259 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 9 33% 9.73 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 128 92% 118 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 78%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1TB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 148 171 182 176 180 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 378 Write 218 Mixed 283 SusWrite 171 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 9.1 4K Mixed 9.6 35% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 118 89% 120 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 128GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 83% null MHz 3968, 32767, 32767, 32767, 28803 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 9.7 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.1 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 225 18% 225 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 129%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,147x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,061x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325