bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DB85FL
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '19 at 03:00
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 210
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 533
54% 441 Pts
64-Core 573
36% 573 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 2128 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 59.2
Parallax 51.8
51% 57.9 fps
MRender 47.1
Gravity 55.9
Splatting 0.13
25% 34.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256L9S-11 2.5 7mm 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC8110E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 376 357 406 407 372 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 394
Mixed 284
SusWrite 375
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 30.7
112% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 202
188% 290 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91%
Great: 103%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 110 113 110 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 120
Write 109
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 111
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 86%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
1GB free, PID 0233
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.9 4.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
2.61% Terrible
Read 6.7
Write 1.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.7
5% 4.32 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.61%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 17.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 20.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback