| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| System | HP Presario CQ62 Notebook PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 143B |
| Memory | 4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit väriä |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20111205 |
| Uptime | 24.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 11 '19 at 19:00 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II P920 Quad-Core
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
|
34.2%
Below average
|
28% 41.1 Pts
|
12% 92.6 Pts
|
6% 92 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
HP(103C 143B) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
|
0.28%
Terrible
|
0% 0.37 fps
|
0% 0.41 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 121 88 46 56 56 MB/s
|
41%
Average
|
41% 186 MB/s
|
40% 11.8 MB/s
|
72% 136 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
407GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 69 66 64 70 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
47% 63.7 MB/s
|
118% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
20.8%
Poor
|
21% 7.27 GB/s
|
15% 5.13 GB/s
|
27% 150 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Presario CQ62 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 38 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Presario CQ62 Notebook PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Celeron 900IntelBench 30%, 3,169 samples | 14x |
| Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples | 5x |
| Athlon II P320AMD $20Bench 34%, 3,972 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples | 14x |
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 11x |
| Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 17% - Very poor | Total price: $15 |