Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 15:44
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.00GHz
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 63
2-Core 126
56% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 528
47% 397 Pts
64-Core 975
60% 975 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24% Poor
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 33.2
23% 31.2 fps
MRender 30.6
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 34.2
26% 30.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 259 259 264 264 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,874
Write 541
Mixed 660
SusWrite 262
182% 834 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 52.5
170% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 414
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 298
234% 327 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 159%
Great: 271%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
639GB free
Firmware: A7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 168 168 167 167 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 50
Write 168
Mixed 38
SusWrite 168
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GC72B4NB1N 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 30.2
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback