Gigabyte GA-H81M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 22 '19 at 08:13
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 129
2-Core 260
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 516
69% 514 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.6% Below average
Lighting 45.1
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 55.5
37% 43.5 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 45.6
Splatting 36.8
30% 37 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Chn25satas1 064 64GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0921A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 175 177 178 140 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 437
Write 162
Mixed 183
SusWrite 164
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 12.4
117% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 71.9
85% 148 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
804GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 121 121 123 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69% Good
Read 119
Write 114
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 121
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLB304G08-GGNHM 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-HD2 Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback