Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display5120 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 23 '19 at 11:58
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$120
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 580
78% 580 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.8% Very good
Lighting 82
Reflection 87.9
Parallax 71.6
67% 80.5 fps
MRender 98
Gravity 103
Splatting 106
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 510 Series 120GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PPG2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 195 199 198 199 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 398
Write 184
Mixed 235
SusWrite 190
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 24.5
95% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 83.9
DQ Write 62.3
DQ Mixed 60.9
49% 69 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
26GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 493
Mixed 376
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 66.1
227% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95
133GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1172 433 305 305 305 305 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,516
Write 1,467
Mixed 1,065
SusWrite 471
304% 1,380 MB/s
4K Read 65.4
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 91.4
326% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 971
DQ Write 1,090
DQ Mixed 998
761% 1,020 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 276%
Great: 280%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 320GB
176GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 68 68 68 66 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 101
Write 97.5
Mixed 64
SusWrite 66.5
61% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 50%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 150GB
53GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 68 68 68 66 67 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.7% Average
Read 78.2
Write 90
Mixed 47
SusWrite 66.6
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 46%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 143 142 146 147 146 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.4% Excellent
Read 145
Write 147
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 145
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.2
243% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 83%
WDC WD10 03FZEX-00MK2A0 1TB
188GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 35 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 38.2
Write 38.7
Mixed 29
SusWrite 34.8
48% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 62%
Generic Mass-Storage 8GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
9.5% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 7.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 4.4
9% 7.53 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.5
166% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 9.5%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 34.3
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 31.7
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 51.6
78% 51.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $693
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback