Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68-VS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68-VS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111007
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 24 '19 at 14:34
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 270-$20
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 64.6
42% 60.8 Pts
4-Core 60.4
8-Core 80.1
9% 70.2 Pts
64-Core 89.6
6% 89.6 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 306.97
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 0.69
2% 1.82 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 68 75 75 80 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 117
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 72.3
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 9905474-060.A00LF 8GB
533, 533 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.4% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 8.6
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-VS3 FX Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VS3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback