MSI Z270 PC MATE (MS-7A72)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A72
MotherboardMSI Z270 PC MATE (MS-7A72)  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180704
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 27 '19 at 03:16
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 271
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 498
69% 511 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 119
Parallax 111
90% 114 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 102
Splatting 103
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 953 855 862 860 856 849 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 1,907
Write 1946
Mixed 1,544
SusWrite 872
352% 1,567 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 72.2
261% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,585
DQ Write 1,248
DQ Mixed 1,345
1,026% 1,393 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 273%
Great: 284%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
338GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1510 1532 745 98 71 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,420
Write 1,564
Mixed 1,082
SusWrite 671
266% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 61.8
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 84.5
312% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 641
DQ Write 906
DQ Mixed 270
345% 606 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 228%
Great: 255%
Seagate ST9640423AS 640GB
596GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 87 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 79.2
Write 81
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 86.9
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 47%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 114 114 115 115 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 152
Write 140
Mixed 85
SusWrite 114
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 87%
WD My Book 25ED 6TB
4TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 161 164 163 164 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 166
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 163
201% 152 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 0.5
402% 8.67 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 0.5
345% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 95%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 24GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 33.4
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 42
SC Mixed 30.5
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 PC MATE (MS-7A72) Builds (Compare 2,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 PC MATE (MS-7A72)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback