Today's hottest deals

Asus N55SF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAsus N55SF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N55SF
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 10:53
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 82.4
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 120
57% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 175
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 2050) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 1.5
2% 4.63 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9640423AS 640GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 41 36 38 38 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 4
Write 33.8
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 36.8
16% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N55SF Builds (Compare 200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N55SF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback