Today's hottest deals

HP Pro 3300 Series MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pro 3300 Series MT  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110823
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJul 30 '19 at 03:28
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 141
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 204
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 203
12% 203 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500
PwrHis(1787 2314) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Lighting 2.97
Reflection 3.85
Parallax 3.56
2% 3.46 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 3.27
Splatting 3.35
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 76 81 83 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 98
Write 93.5
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 80.6
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773SB0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3300 Series MT Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3300 Series MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback