Today's hottest deals

LORD G4x 775 ICH7 8712

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardLORD G4x 775 ICH7 8712  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160430
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 29 '21 at 08:11
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$85
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Memory 42.9
1-Core 27.6
2-Core 74.2
29% 48.2 Pts
4-Core 75.7
8-Core 98
11% 86.8 Pts
64-Core 74.7
5% 74.7 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8496) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 0.5
2% 2.03 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 14 31 68 71 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 86.8
Write 89.4
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 52
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773SB0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G4x 775 ICH7 8712 Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: LORD G4x 775 ICH7 8712

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $78
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback