Today's hottest deals

Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-K  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181017
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 06 '19 at 18:46
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7670K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.5% Below average
Memory 44.9
1-Core 18.9
2-Core 78.3
28% 47.4 Pts
4-Core 99
8-Core 149
15% 124 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Lighting 2.87
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 5.87
2% 3.77 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 2.91
3% 3.36 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
562GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 88 117 96 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 135
Write 153
Mixed 33
SusWrite 98
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
6GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 6 8.4 8.4 7.2 6.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
6.91% Terrible
Read 29.7
Write 13.2
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 7.5
16% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.91%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EWB4GB681PAE-16IC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback