Packard imedia S2110

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard imedia S2110  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard imedia S2110
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '19 at 20:56
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
27.3% Poor
Memory 49.5
1-Core 17.4
2-Core 33.8
24% 33.6 Pts
4-Core 33
8-Core 33.4
4% 33.2 Pts
64-Core 33.9
2% 33.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7570
Dell(1028 2B20) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Lighting 7.53
Reflection 7.38
Parallax 5.81
6% 6.91 fps
MRender 7.14
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 7.26
5% 6.55 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 82 49 72 86 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 95.5
Write 83.9
Mixed 52
SusWrite 70.9
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Apacer 75.B83C1.G120B 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 5.1
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 3.9
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S2110 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S2110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback