Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1200 APU 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 23% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Memory 73.1 1-Core 8.5 2-Core 22.4 29% 34.7 Pts	4-Core 27.5 8-Core 28.4 4% 28 Pts	64-Core 28.9 2% 28.9 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50 10,446 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 266GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 49 51 61 36 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Read 16.7 Write 49.6 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 48.5 25% 33.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 54%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 64GB 1,211 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 3GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.3 10 11 11 9.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	3.59% Terrible	Read 7.1 Write 10.4 Mixed 6.9 SusWrite 9.7 12% 8.52 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.4 19% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 3.59% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773EB0-CK0 M471B5673FH0-CF8 4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 800, 533 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 4.7 11% 3.83 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.1 SC Mixed 1.4 3% 1.13 GB/s	Latency 94.4 42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 28%, 329 samples	8x
CT102464BF186D.M16 CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 16GBUnknownBench 33%, 7 samples	4x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 31%, 243 samples	4x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16