Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics2.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '15 at 08:31
Run Duration372 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 153
54% 118 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 563
52% 432 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 48% Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
XFX(1682 3198) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.301.1004.0
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.25% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 5
2% 3.71 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 4.97
Splatting 2.35
2% 3.04 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.25%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TB
775GB free
Firmware: 1.10
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 171
Write 132
Mixed 131
108% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 4.65
4K Mixed 0.81
219% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 195%
Seagate ST320DM000-1BD14 320GB
19GB free
Firmware: KC65
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 149
Write 187
Mixed 146
120% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.87
158% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
19GB free
Firmware: 15.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 170
Mixed 149
129% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.92
169% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 105%
Great: 65%
18GB free
Firmware: PMAP
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD My Passport 071A 500GB
457GB free, PID 071a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 18%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
21GB free, PID fa64
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 9.55
Mixed 7.92
14% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.008
19% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 8%
Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback