Asus Z97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140711
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '19 at 05:47
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 134
2-Core 223
88% 151 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 697
69% 565 Pts
64-Core 696
43% 696 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
PNY(196E 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 44.7
Reflection 44.7
Parallax 39.8
36% 43.1 fps
MRender 40.7
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 35.9
32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 255 81 82 81 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 424
Write 142
Mixed 313
SusWrite 130
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 32
121% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 177
155% 230 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
418GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 130 130 131 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 125
Write 116
Mixed 65
SusWrite 127
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 0420 F3-14900CL9-4GBSR 16GB
1867, 1600, 1867 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 17.5
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $998
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback