Today's hottest deals

Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateAug 11 '19 at 21:53
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66% Good
Memory 53.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 198
67% 123 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 629
65% 526 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 66%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 49.2
48% 56.8 fps
MRender 43.3
Gravity 56.2
Splatting 45.9
40% 48.5 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 45%
Great: 101%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP580 240GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 134 137 134 136 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 401
Write 382
Mixed 306
SusWrite 146
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 16.1
90% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 34.8
73% 146 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GU88A30-FGGHMB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.5% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 20.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $372
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback