Today's hottest deals

Asrock B450M Pro4-F R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 06:22
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 209
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 523
53% 431 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3256GNTD 256GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMB0.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1111 373 211 210 210 210 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,293
Write 1,147
Mixed 1,109
SusWrite 388
220% 984 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 65.4
220% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 697
DQ Write 479
DQ Mixed 642
465% 606 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 170%
Great: 226%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
296GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 90 90 90 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 97.6
Write 87.2
Mixed 92.1
SusWrite 89.4
68% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST33000650NS 3TB-$100
316GB free
Firmware: 0006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 116 119 117 124 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 109
Write 106
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 120
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GU88A30-FGGHMB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 36.4
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 29.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4-F R2.0 Builds (Compare 355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback