Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory42.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171201
Uptime18.6 Days
Run DateAug 16 '19 at 07:32
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 135
55% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 497
47% 391 Pts
64-Core 1,022
63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1073) 1GB
CLim: 1385 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 17.5
16% 18.1 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 20
Splatting 17.4
16% 20.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,801
Write 1,240
Mixed 602
267% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 47.8
169% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 815
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 531
406% 562 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
143GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 39.3
Write 37.3
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 37.7
27% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 66%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
13GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6 5.9 5.6 5.8 5.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 29
Write 5.5
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 5.9
12% 12 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.6
163% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 17%
HDD 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 2551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 216 215 216 218 213 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 211
Write 216
Mixed 85
SusWrite 215
242% 182 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.1
99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD M378A2K43CB1-CRC M378A2K43CB1-CTD M378A2K43CB1-CRC 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 26.2
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 23.2
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback