PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150212 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 16 '19 at 17:25 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
60.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.7%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 301 300 302 302 304 MB/s
|
94.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
205GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 304 305 304 304 305 MB/s
|
98.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba HDWL120 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: JT000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 132 133 133 133 MB/s
|
81.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Team Team--Elite-1333 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 233x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 102x |
FX-8320AMD $95Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 95x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 41x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $467 |