Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 01:14
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 226
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 604
61% 495 Pts
64-Core 625
39% 625 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1AB1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 64
Parallax 7.3
5% 25.8 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.4
7% 7.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$66
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,086
Write 900
Mixed 763
204% 916 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 58.7
197% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 615
DQ Mixed 222
240% 391 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 209%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
120GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 157 161 158 167 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 357
Write 154
Mixed 218
SusWrite 158
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3.8
36% 8.57 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 97%
Toshiba HDWL120 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 131 133 131 137 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 149
Write 144
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 131
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
155% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 11.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12.3
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 2,242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback