Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V15.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V15.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V15.3
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190716
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 19:56
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 502
56% 438 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Device(1D05 1068) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 39.1
Parallax 38.5
29% 37.7 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 25.9
25% 31 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,959
Write 1,092
Mixed 1,222
314% 1,425 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 51.7
178% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 830
DQ Write 571
DQ Mixed 716
530% 705 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 249%
Adata SWORDFISH 500GB
61GB free
Firmware: V9002s57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 654 854 884 896 80 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,392
Write 822
Mixed 794
SusWrite 577
199% 896 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 33.9
120% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 564
DQ Mixed 462
345% 450 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 148%
Great: 256%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
79.4% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 23
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V15.3 Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V15.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback