Today's hottest deals

Asus P5KPL/1600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5KPL/1600  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080528
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 16 '19 at 22:30
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 35.8
2-Core 71.8
41% 60.4 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 143
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
PwrHis(1787 2320) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1225 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 35.8
22% 30.9 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 34.5
23% 27.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 88 88 96 100 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 119
Write 111
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 89.2
70% 96 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 77%
Seagate ST3500412AS 500GB
417GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 92 90 96 100 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 90.9
Write 91.1
Mixed 25
SusWrite 91.1
54% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler 102 8GB
3GB free, PID 162d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.3 6.9 6.7 7 7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
7.61% Terrible
Read 19.3
Write 8
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 6.7
11% 9.68 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
51% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.61%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 5.2
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL/1600 Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL/1600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $279
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback