Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer C1_MB
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '19 at 11:14
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 99%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 252
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 746
75% 612 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$391
Gigabyte(1458 37C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 130
Parallax 144
113% 137 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 124
Splatting 91.3
94% 119 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.05% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 7.16
6% 8.3 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 14.2
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.05%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7101Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 719 652 648 688 646 642 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,188
Write 1,426
Mixed 850
SusWrite 666
232% 1,032 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 75.8
249% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,110
DQ Write 1,041
DQ Mixed 1,109
823% 1,087 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 214%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 23
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 26.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback