Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 11:37
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 88.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 256
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 777
78% 634 Pts
64-Core 1,242
77% 1,242 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
PNY(196E 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.5% Very good
Lighting 96.5
Reflection 113
Parallax 103
79% 104 fps
MRender 96.8
Gravity 94
Splatting 95.8
78% 95.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS2211 240GB-$90
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS221016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 272 262 228 312 303 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 433
Mixed 317
SusWrite 278
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 36
128% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 181
180% 287 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
516GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 171 174 173 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 158
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 173
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2
367% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 101%
Great: 111%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 32GB
27GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 13 9.3 10 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Read 5
Write 1
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 11.8
7% 5.07 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 8%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
930GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 39.3
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 39.8
48% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 32.6
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 26.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback