Today's hottest deals

Aleksey E5 VER: 3.2S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAleksey E5 VER: 3.2S1  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 31 '19 at 19:36
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 82
2-Core 171
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 626
57% 477 Pts
64-Core 833
52% 833 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3741) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2347 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.2% Good
Lighting 83
Reflection 79.5
Parallax 71.8
68% 78.1 fps
MRender 83.4
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 75.8
63% 77.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HS-SSD-C2000 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 891 304 305 304 305 246 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,804
Write 1,002
Mixed 658
SusWrite 393
212% 964 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 47.1
153% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 539
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 468
338% 442 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 163%
Great: 203%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
8GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 49 48 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 43
Write 43
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 47.9
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 36%
External USB3.0 80GB
28GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 20.3
Write 28.3
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 18.8
17% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 26%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
60GB free
Firmware: 3.AAF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 88 86 88 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 63
Write 63.8
Mixed 40
SusWrite 88.5
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 53%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB
406GB free, PID 61b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 26.3
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 16.6
33% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
86% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70CH0- 16GB
1866, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
114% Outstanding
MC Read 49.9
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 45.2
131% 45.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 11.1
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E5 VER: 3.2S1 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Aleksey E5 VER: 3.2S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $760
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback