Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 86.1 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 159 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 630 56% 475 Pts	64-Core 813 50% 813 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 847B) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.92% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 0.7 2% 1.83 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.92% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 175 116 82 75 64 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 452 Write 319 Mixed 330 SusWrite 103 67% 301 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 51.3 4K Mixed 26.4 99% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 190 166% 245 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 88%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154 24,344 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 370GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 85 85 84 85 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 83.5 Write 90.7 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 84.9 56% 76.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- 2x4GB 660 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	47.4% Average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 10.3 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

RAM
M393B5170FH0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 660 samples	205x
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	179x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	45x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16