Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '19 at 22:26
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 95
1-Core 129
2-Core 253
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 638
64% 520 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.8.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Lighting 45.9
Reflection 50.8
Parallax 54.6
37% 50.4 fps
MRender 50.7
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 36.4
34% 43.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 491
Write 480
Mixed 316
95% 429 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 45.4
157% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 176
183% 301 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Synology iSCSI Storage 1.5TB
232GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 277 275 276 275 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 181
Write 330
Mixed 261
SusWrite 275
60% 262 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 27.2
89% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 81.9
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 101
75% 98.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.2% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 25.1
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV FORMULA Builds (Compare 594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA - $714

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback