Asus H97-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H97-PRO  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '19 at 06:59
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 202
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 382
51% 382 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 189 160 135 180 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 203
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 173
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.1
382% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 42 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 267
Write 44.3
Mixed 50
SusWrite 40.9
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
355% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 135%
SanDisk Ultra 248GB
101GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 81.4
Write 23.8
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 22.4
42% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.6
105% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 21%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-035.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.8% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 18.8
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 21
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PRO Builds (Compare 679 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback