Today's hottest deals

Asrock H87M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock H87M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateNov 02 '16 at 15:40
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$118
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 112
2-Core 219
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 427
57% 428 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6869
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 46.8
Parallax 41
41% 45.9 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 42.3
Splatting 38
32% 39.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
70GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 406
Mixed 420
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 42.2
154% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 129
144% 246 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 134%
Toshiba HG6 128GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JURA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 391
Mixed 499
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 39.8
122% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 158
160% 258 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
446GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 161
Write 135
Mixed 153
113% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.12
52% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
267GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 87.6
Write 86.9
Mixed 61.3
99% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.2
60% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 50%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
97GB free, PID 2351
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 38.8
Write 38.8
Mixed 34
48% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.23
86% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.6% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 19.8
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 21
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M Pro4 Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H87M Pro4 - $151

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback