Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-MX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120815
Uptime17.8 Days
Run DateSep 09 '19 at 07:54
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 98
2-Core 187
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 349
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.14% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 7.85
Parallax 8.97
7% 8.3 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.14%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 21 40 46 57 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 11.5
Write 19.9
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 49
17% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 84%
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
51GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 61 62 63 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 62.3
Write 56.4
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 61.9
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron V01D3L84GB52852813 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-MX R2.0 Builds (Compare 741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback