bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory50.8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 50.8GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory41.3 GB free of 50.7813 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 620 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime10 Days
Run DateSep 13 '19 at 14:16
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Memory 37
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 77.1
32% 54.2 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 561
39% 364 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 66%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 864GB
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,074
Write 898
Mixed 966
218% 979 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 23.7
81% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 249
211% 309 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 50GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 2048, 512, 256, 32 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 39.7
123% 43 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.6
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback