Huanan X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardHuanan X58  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '19 at 19:34
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 153
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 429
44% 352 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Gigabyte(1458 226B) 2GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 8.85
Parallax 9.09
0% 6 fps
MRender 7.57
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 8.48
6% 7.52 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.16%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 102 50 50 44 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.2% Average
Read 215
Write 113
Mixed 187
SusWrite 58.1
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 17.3
79% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 75.8
DQ Mixed 8.2
30% 68 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
78GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 76 77 77 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 71.3
Write 49.5
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 75.1
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GB
1333, 1333, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.2% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Huanan X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback