Huananzhi X58-RX3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardHuananzhi X58-RX3.0  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180619
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 16:44
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 164
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 450
49% 387 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 1346) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 26
Parallax 20.9
17% 22.7 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 238 236 144 97 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.6% Average
Read 258
Write 238
Mixed 231
SusWrite 173
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 0.8
57% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 46.3
DQ Mixed 0.8
28% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 92%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
931GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 140 136 136 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 105
Write 43.7
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 137
67% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GB
1333, 1333, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14.5
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58-RX3.0 Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Huananzhi X58-RX3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback