Today's hottest deals

Notebook W65_67SZ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemNotebook W65_67SZ  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_67SZ
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 16 '19 at 12:43
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 154
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 245
31% 235 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 0655) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4416
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.8% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 6.69
Parallax 6.38
3% 5.67 fps
MRender 7.38
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.87
5% 5.86 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.8%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disque virtuel Microsoft 107GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 136 136 134 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.2% Good
Read 401
Write 258
Mixed 222
SusWrite 136
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 23.5
85% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 245
200% 287 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 64%
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-00000 256GB
120GB free
Firmware: EMT0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 137 137 135 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 439
Write 280
Mixed 222
SusWrite 137
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 37
130% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 237
202% 298 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 1315 CT102464BF160B.M16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.6% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 19.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65_67SZ Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_67SZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback